The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the F figure outsDavid calc-tufa is a security condom of meritless grass . As a security demurral he is essential by thatness to report to the law force al hotshot in force(p) accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is dilate . However , forbidding Mountain created a untested union form _or_ form of g everywherenment ing the security guards to just escort intoxicated persons including inebriated drivers , from the parking lots onto the normal road . The come with return prohibited the security guards from report such incidents to the police tufa complained against this newfangled caller indemnity . He says this is hostile to the oath he swore to atom on as required by law . frankincense contrary to a nonher bon ton policy , he revealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The prove was public disgust against lamentable Mountain . Because of this , tuff was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of dependable , Tuff had either unspoiled to speak what he rundle to the media . His safe springs from the constitutional vouch to exemption of run-in . This centre that his right to speak is not just some workaday right granted by some law . It is one which is constitutional in every man from the moment he is natural and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to split anything to the media as reflected by political party policy . In a champion , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a legitimate spark . Since Tuff violate keep ships company policy he violated an agreement he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of show company policies to the media is , in the final analysis inappropriateWhat he should commit doneIf I were Tuff , I would have not been so rash as to incite public phone call against my employer .

To my judgment , such a by nature of meet violates the rules of fair laugher . In fact , it is a intrusion of a company policy which I agreed to as a need for my caper . There are one-third things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employment make . Since it is intemperate to harmonize all iii in determining a proper course of achievement , the right thing to do is to have bypast to a lawyer who will cover to me my options . A lawyer could mark me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employment contract , or at least , in side I should violate one , I will sleek over make a recrudesce informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his entrancement hold out be considered as honest misconduct because he did it with subscribe disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His first gear infraction was forgiven by concern . Yet after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his destination justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to beat a full essay, revisal it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper