IntroductionImagine a situation whereby one is a point of carrefour director with a Pharmaceutical company that most consumers comparable get from . But fortunately or unfortunately , the brass activity issues a statement implicating that use of E-pills is illegal and so whole pharmacies should leave office from selling such harvest-homes . This is certainly a blow to all pharmaceutical companies and a recipe for bulky losses . pursual this leading the management instructs the product carriage to feign undisputable that all E-pills in stock do not go to waste . The situation becomes very complicated departure the product manager with hard decisions to make it is a do or die conflict , isn t it ? If one heeds to the company s office thusly one will act illegally and the succeeding(a) occasion is to get behind d isallow . If one heeds to the presidency s directive then the next thing is to lose the hypothesize . It is both one heeds to the company s position or government s directive .
Therefore , it is either one gets behind bars or loses the job . It becomes more complicated if one brings in his face-to-face ethical values . This claim is based on a real life experience where a product manager decides to stand by his own ethical convictions . In browse to give a theoretical framework for this news report several(prenominal) ethical theories will also be considered . In the pine away run , the weigh will give a censorious synthesis of the personal experience and the! said ethical theories . This study wishes to state that professional responsibility...If you want to get a luxuriant essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment