Compare and contrast two main theories of ?crime and aberration?. ??a diabetic at work without a new-fangled insulin injection approaching the lunch break may initiate tense, erratic, short tempered, but that behaviour does non constitute a criminal act?? (Kelly, Holborn and Makin, (1983) sited in; M. Haralambos and M. Holborn (2000)) It is regarded amongst sociologists that physiological characteristics do not cause criminal or deviant behaviour. This paper allow look at a few of the main functionalist and strife theories of crime and deviance and conclude with which one, in relation to the title, provides the largest eubstance of evidence.

Functionalist theorists wall that crime and deviance is caused by ?structural tensions? where as conflict theorists argue that ?deviance is deliberately chosen, and often governmental in nature?. Functionalists argue that people commit crimes because thither is something hurt with the society the individual is in, and that this is what causes the indi...If you want to get a affluent essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper